

Public Sector Solutions
Key Takeaway
A New Jersey foundation tried paying grantees for results instead of programs, unleashing both greater creativity and improved outcomes.
In this op-ed for the Chronicle of Philanthropy, Nadine Abraham makes the case for outcomes-based funding as a more effective alternative to traditional grant making — giving nonprofits unrestricted, flexible capital upfront while tying additional payments to real results. Drawing on Social Finance’s partnership with a New Jersey foundation to increase earned income tax credit uptake, Abraham shows how the approach unlocked grantee creativity, improved outcomes, and deepened funder-grantee trust in ways traditional grants rarely achieve.
Related Insight

Putting Capital to Work: A guide for investing in people, pathways, and prosperity
This paper shares six principles we have found to be critical in structuring funds and investing in distinct opportunities.